Fifth Graders Had Sex in Class!!!!

i know what i might say might sound a little wierd but...
i feel that doing it in front of a class was wrong and that the teacher should definatly be charged in some way.
but them having sex is not f***ed up all that much. i feel them being that young,and feeling that they should do it in front of a class is a little wierd but i still feel that sex is a choice and no matter what age you are you have to make it. they decided to make it at that age. i sound stupid but its probably because im used to seeing people just like a year or two older than that doing it too. but i made a choice to be abstinent until mariage and i plan to carry that out.
 
yeah, that's why the kids in Europe are a lot more responsible, yet uninhibited and free. They sell porn on the streets to anyone who wants to buy it. And, there's much more of it on TV, uncensored as well. Too much infiltration of the damn liberalism in this country. If you start telling kids, that you can't do this or that, can't look at this or that, guess what?! They will do just because it's "forbidden". And by no means I'm advocating what they did as a good thing. It's terrible. But the way we react to it, involve the media, etc.,etc. etc....Oh my, we do have a hell of a lot to learn from the Europeans........light years away....:doh:
:doh: That's where he went! :doh: Dehawk loaded up his nut sack with coon cash and is hitching his way to Europe! :doh:
 
i know what i might say might sound a little wierd but...
i feel that doing it in front of a class was wrong and that the teacher should definatly be charged in some way.
but them having sex is not f***ed up all that much. i feel them being that young,and feeling that they should do it in front of a class is a little wierd but i still feel that sex is a choice and no matter what age you are you have to make it. they decided to make it at that age. i sound stupid but its probably because im used to seeing people just like a year or two older than that doing it too. but i made a choice to be abstinent until mariage and i plan to carry that out.

Shani I just have to say having sex at 12 and 13 is ****ed up and don't let anyone tell you differently. 12 year olds are not mature enough to handle a sexual relationship not to mention unwanted pregnancies and STDs. Just because kids a few years older than you are making the choice to have sex doesn't make it right and I really hope you do stay abstinent until you are older or married like you said. :hug:
 
KIDS under the age of EIGHTEEN may know the mechanics of sexual intercourse, but they have noooooooooooooo clue as to the emotional and psychological connections that are required. Nor can they at such an age! Let me tell you folks, I have seen young teens and young adults come in with STD's and pregnancies from "good stable families" and "ghetto poor" families. It strikes all classes. Parents can do the best they can with instruction, but, peer pressure, personalities, and, any number of factoring plays into such actions.

Frankly, I feel teacher's should begin with a salary of $100,000 and work on up the scale for what they have to deal with in that job! Parents should look at this article and work harder to communicate, appreciate and validate their parental roles to their own kids with the hope that when the children are in difficult situations, the parental-child relationship will shine through. Parenting.........not for whimps.
 
That is all true...and I've seen pregnant 13 years old come in who can't even spell the word "baby" or "parenting".....but my biggest problem with all this nonsense is the legality of their actions. Not to be confused with what we think is a right or wrong thing to do. I'm saying is that our legal system is gone kaput beyond repair....
 
Sometimes Kids over the age of eighteen don't have any clue about the emotional and psychological connections that are required...
 
i think kids that age should be learning not having sex are what ever they might have been doing.
 
all my teachers that have braced the subject told people not to have sex but i still see people doing it.
 
Study: Abstinence programs no guarantee

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Students who took part in sexual abstinence programs were just as likely to have sex as those who did not, according to a study ordered by Congress.

Also, those who attended one of the four abstinence classes that were reviewed reported having similar numbers of sexual partners as those who did not attend the classes. And they first had sex at about the same age as other students -- 14.9 years according to Mathematica Policy Research Inc.

The federal government now spends about $176 million annually on abstinence-until-marriage education. Critics have repeatedly said they don't believe the programs are working, and the study will give them reinforcement.

However, Bush administration officials cautioned against drawing sweeping conclusions from the study. They said the four programs reviewed -- among several hundred across the nation -- were some of the very first established after Congress overhauled the nation's welfare laws in 1996.

Officials said one lesson they learned from the study is that the abstinence message should be reinforced in subsequent years to truly affect behavior.

"This report confirms that these interventions are not like vaccines. You can't expect one dose in middle school, or a small dose, to be protective all throughout the youth's high school career," said Harry Wilson, the commissioner of the Family and Youth Services Bureau at the Administration for Children and Families.

For its study, Mathematica looked at students in four abstinence programs around the country as well as students from the same communities who did not participate in the abstinence programs. The 2,057 youths came from big cities -- Miami, Florida, and Milwaukee, Wisconsin -- as well as rural communities -- Powhatan, Virginia, and Clarksdale, Mississippi.

The students who participated in abstinence education did so for one to three years. Their average age was 11 to 12 when they entered the programs back in 1999.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/04/13/abstinence.study.ap/index.html

And they first had sex at about the same age as other students -- 14.9 years
:faint: :doh:

This is very discouraging to read. I don't know what the answer is.
 
its really hard to stay absinent with the people i know. they have sex or do sexual things without being in a relasionship. its wierd but i don't let it get to me.
 
Too much stress is being put on 'what they are teaching in school' instead of 'what they are learning at home'......morality lessons should start when you bring you children home from the hospital and should be taught by example.

For the conscientious parent, this occurrence can be a learning/teaching tool.

You never quite know if they are absorbing it all until they are confronted with making the decisions themselves, but a parent still needs to keep plugging away....and pray for the best.

And I agree, it is quite disturbing.:(
 
What the people are teaching at school and what the kids are learning at school can be two very different things. We all know that when you hit a certain point in adolescence youre invincible, you know better than anyone else whats best for you, and youre smarter than everyone - especially your stupid parents who only tell you not to do things because theyre mean.

Its not so simple as an upbringing full of morals and values, even the children of preachers (1 , 2) arent immune to peer pressure and other external influences. Im not saying theres no one to blame but the kids, I just think its unfair and a cop out, scapegoat philosophy, whatever, to just say its simply because of poor parenting.

Its not enough to educate the kids; the kids have to give a crap.
 
What the people are teaching at school and what the kids are learning at school can be two very different things. We all know that when you hit a certain point in adolescence youre invincible, you know better than anyone else whats best for you, and youre smarter than everyone - especially your stupid parents who only tell you not to do things because theyre mean.

Its not so simple as an upbringing full of morals and values, even the children of preachers (1 , 2) arent immune to peer pressure and other external influences. Im not saying theres no one to blame but the kids, I just think its unfair and a cop out, scapegoat philosophy, whatever, to just say its simply because of poor parenting.

Its not enough to educate the kids; the kids have to give a crap.

Preachers do not always live by what they preach. That is why I said, let them learn by example. The majority of the children with issues do not come from solid homes with caring parents who are involved in their children's lives. There's a lot of luck and prayer involved in it too. And sometimes kids are going to do what kids are going to do, but that should never be the cop out, you should always be reinforcing for them to do 'the right thing'.

My point is schools are there to assist parents, not the other way around. The majority of the responsibility does fall upon the parent, even if the parent needs to seek help elsewhere for their child.
 
My son has a friend who is a preachers son. He is 8 and he is a not the most respectful child I will just say. The parents are very nice people but in my opinion they are doormats and don't set a lot of boundaries. If this kid doesn't feel like doing something he doesn't have to. Needless to say he spent last summer in summer school.

I do agree it is up to the parents to teach morality and values. It is just too bad so many parents these days do not have those values themselves. I swear there are women out there that still don't know where babies come from. :rolleyes:
 
You saw this one coming

My son has a friend who is a preachers son. He is 8 and he is a not the most respectful child I will just say.

*sings* The only boy who could ever have-sex-with-a-girl-at-age-8... was the son of a preacher man!
 
Back
Top